The Binding of Satan*
By Ivan Foster
[* From ‘Watching and Waiting’ (October-December, 2014.)]
There are reasons why the binding of Satan in Revelation 20:14
cannot refer to his defeat at
I understand that it is
generally believed among a-millennialists that the binding of Satan, in Revelation 20, is a reference to what happened to him at
God’s Word always makes good sense. It is true that we may not be able to fully comprehend at all times what it is that God is saying in His Word, but it is never contrary to reason. The virgin birth of Christ may have been beyond the full comprehension of the Old Testament believers, but the revelation of how that came about, as recorded for us in the Gospels of Matthew and Luke, indicates that the mystery, while outside the realm of human experience, was not outside the realm of the possible and the reasonable. With God all things are possible and when finally understood by men, perfectly reasonable.
For the post-tribulation Pre-millennialist, Revelation 20: 1-4 is a plain record of a future event that will take place AFTER the return of Christ in glory to claim for Himself the kingdoms of this earth and reign over them for one thousand years.
The various incidents recorded here - the binding of Satan with a great chain, his casting into the bottomless pit, his prevention by a seal from deceiving the nations until the thousand years are ended, the martyred dead from the time of the antichrist reigning with Christ upon the earth, are all literal statements of what will take place after Christ returns.
The mystical, symbolic and figurative method of interpretation in which many unfortunately indulge, would have us believe that this refers to a past event and that the restrictions imposed upon the devil are in operation NOW! That is just impossible to believe for those who treat the Word of God REVERENTLY and SERIOUSLY, and who simply TAKE GOD AT HIS WORD.
I have some questions for those
who hold to the notion that Revelation 20: 1-4 refers
If the binding of the devil refers to the Saviour’s victory at Calvary does
not this imply that he was not bound before
Such an idea is totally erroneous. The devil has always been under restraint. This certainly was the case in Job’s day. ‘And the LORD said unto Satan, Behold, all that he hath is in thy power; only upon himself put not forth thine hand’ (Job 1: 12). ‘And the LORD said unto Satan, Behold, he is in thine hand; but save his life’ (Job 2: 6).
What of the statement of Joseph when questioned by his frightened brethren? ‘But as for you, ye thought evil against me; but God meant it unto good, to bring to pass, as it is this day, to save much people alive’ (Genesis 50: 20). Here is God ruling over the actions and intentions of the devil and wicked men. What the wise man says in Proverbs 16: 4: ‘The LORD hath made all things for Himself: yea, even the wicked for the day of evil’ is high doctrine indeed but it makes clear that God overrules all things for His own eternal purpose and glory.
These restrictions continued in New Testament times as is evident from the following verses. ‘And Jesus asked him, saying, What is thy name? And he said, Legion: because many devils were entered into him. And they besought Him that He would not command them to go out into the deep. And there was there an herd of many swine feeding on the mountain: and they besought Him that He would suffer them to enter into them. And He suffered them. Then went the devils out of the man, and entered into the swine: and the herd ran violently down a steep place into the lake, and were choked’ (Luke 8: 30-33). The devils were required to seek Christ’s permission before they could enter the swine. This denotes the degree of submission to Christ under which they existed.
there was in their synagogue a man with an unclean spirit; and he cried out, saying,
Let us alone; what have we to do
with Thee, Thou Jesus of
The Saviour’s words to Peter when he very foolishly rebuked the Saviour indicate His sovereignty over the devil. ‘Then Peter took Him, and began to rebuke Him, saying, Be it far from Thee, Lord: this shall not be unto Thee. But He turned, and said unto Peter, Get thee behind Me, Satan: thou art an offence unto Me: for thou savourest not the things that be of God, but those that be of men’ (Matthew 16: 22-23).
Later, just before His betrayal, the Saviour’s words to Peter again indicate His power over Satan. ‘And the Lord said, Simon, Simon, behold, Satan hath desired to have you, that he may sift you as wheat: but I have prayed for thee, that thy faith fail not: and when thou art converted, strengthen thy brethren’ (Luke 22: 31-32).
Paul tells the Corinthian believers that the degree to which they can be tempted by the devil, the great tempter (1 Thessalonians 3: 5), is under the restraint of God. ‘There hath no temptation taken you but such as is common to man: but God is faithful, Who will not suffer you to be tempted above that ye are able; but will with the temptation also make a way to escape, that ye may be able to bear it’ (1 Corinthians 10: 13).
The devil cannot do all that he would desire to do with God’s people today and has always been under this restriction. But that is very different from the restrictions that are listed in Revelation 20:14.
If at Calvary, Christ took the devil and ‘bound him a thousand years, and cast him into the bottomless pit, and shut him up, and set a seal upon him, that he should deceive the nations no more, till the thousand years should be fulfilled,’ then how can Peter, subsequent to Calvary, be inspired by the Holy Ghost to state clearly: ‘Be sober, be vigilant; because your adversary the devil, as a roaring lion, walketh about, seeking whom he may devour: whom resist stedfast in the faith, knowing that the same afflictions are accomplished in your brethren that are in the world’ (1 Peter 5: 8-9)?
How can Satan be walking about and threatening Christians with destruction, some thirty-odd years after Calvary if he was there bound, shut up and sealed ‘that he should deceive the nations no more, till the thousand years should be fulfilled’? And how can he who is so bound and imprisoned be resisted by the child of God today?
‘Neither give place to the devil’ (Ephesians 4: 27). ‘Not a novice, lest being lifted up with pride he fall into the condemnation of the devil. Moreover he must have a good report of them which are without; lest he fall into reproach and the snare of the devil’ (1 Timothy 3: 6-7).
What are we to make of Christ’s words to the church in Smyrna when He said: ‘Fear none of those things which thou shalt suffer: behold, the devil shall cast some of you into prison, that ye may be tried; and ye shall have tribulation ten days: be thou faithful unto death, and I will give thee a crown of life’ (Revelation 2: 10)? How can the devil be ‘cast ... into the bottomless pit, and shut ... up,’ and a seal set upon him, ‘that he should deceive the nations no more’ and yet be free to cast some at Smyrna into prison?
This [A-millennialists’ spiritual] interpretation of Revelation 20: 14 just does not make sense, but makes a mockery of God’s Word. Indeed, the propagation of such a notion is but further evidence of the devil being on the loose and deceiving the nations, and some believers, still!
Does this [‘mystical, symbolic and figurative method of interpretation’ by all Anti-millennialists] not make a farce of God’s Word and make the cross-work of Christ a vain, meaningless and empty thing? The binding of Satan which Christ is alleged to have carried out is seen to be most ineffective. How this [popular and satanic] teaching shames the Saviour and His cross-work!
If Christ has shut the devil up so that ‘he should deceive the nations no more, till the thousand years should be fulfilled: and after that he must be loosed a little season,’ whence has come the tide of deception that has marked this Christian era and has made the task of evangelising the nations so incredibly difficult?
I know what the Bible says in answer to this question. Consider these verses: ‘But Peter said, Ananias, why hath Satan filled thine heart to lie to the Holy Ghost, and to keep back part of the price of the land?’ (Acts 5: 3). ‘But if our gospel be hid, it is hid to them that are lost: in whom the god of this world hath blinded the minds of them which believe not, lest the light of the glorious gospel [‘gospel of the glory’ R.V.] of Christ, Who is the image of God, should shine unto them’ (2 Corinthians 4: 34). ‘Wherein in time past ye walked according to the course of this world, according to the prince of the power of the air, the spirit that now worketh in the children of disobedience’ (Ephesians 2: 2). ‘Put on the whole armour of God, that ye may be able to stand against the wiles of the devil. For we wrestle not against flesh and blood, but against principalities, against powers, against the rulers of the darkness of this world, against spiritual wickedness in high places. Wherefore take unto you the whole armour of God, that ye may be able to withstand in the evil day, and having done all, to stand ... Above all, taking the shield of faith, wherewith ye shall be able to quench all the fiery darts of the wicked’ (Ephesians 6: 11-13, 16). ‘Now the Spirit speaketh expressly, that in the latter times some shall depart [apostatise] from the faith, giving heed to seducing spirits, and doctrines of devils’ (1 Timothy 4: 1). ‘Submit yourselves therefore to God. Resist the devil, and he will flee from you’ (James 4: 7). ‘And we know that we are of God, and the whole world lieth in wickedness (or the arms of the wicked one)’ (1 John 5: 19).
All these verses carry only one
meaning and that is that the devil is UNBOUND, UNCHAINED
and to a large degree UNRESTRICTED in his activities against
the people of God. He presently poses a
major threat to Christ’s cause and is depicted as such by the post-Calvary
writers of the New Testament and his
activities are in complete contrast to that restraint which the a-millennialist
says is presently imposed upon him as set forth in Revelation 20: 14. How can this be so if the restraints depicted
by John in the Apocalypse were imposed at
The answer is obvious, surely. These verses all speak of a very active devil and the people of God are exhorted by Christ to resist him and battle against him. How would that be at all possible if we are presently in that era when the devil is bound and chained?
If the events of Revelation 20: 14 are current, how can it refer to those who suffered death under antichrist as having been resurrected and reigning [upon and over this restored earth (Rom. 8: 19-22)] with Christ?
saints are described as those ‘which had not
worshipped the beast, neither
his image, neither had received his mark upon
their foreheads, or in their hands; and they lived and
reigned with Christ a thousand years.’ If we are presently in the period referred to
in these verses, and we must be if verses 1
and 2 refer to
If Revelation 20: 14 refers to Christ’s victory over the devil at
mean that there is to be a rescinding of
I repeat, the circulation of such an absurd and unscriptural notion as that propounded by the a-millennialist with regards Revelation 20: 1-4, is in itself a clear evidence that the old propagator of falsehoods, or as the Saviour calls him, the father of lies (John 8: 44), is far removed from imprisonment but is very actively pursuing his plan of deceit [in the lives of many of God’s redeemed people].*
That many earnest Christian people are thinking these thoughts and putting them into their prayers is borne in upon me just now from what I read and hear. A few hours ago I was conversing with an old and valued friend who rather startled me by asking whether I did not deem it possible that the ancient Christian belief in a reign of antichrist might becoming literally true. I sat silent, pondering the interrogatory, and my friend continued to speak somewhat in these terms:-
“There would seem to be a gathering up and concentration of the forces of evil in the world to-day, an open and undisguised trial of strength between the powers of light and the powers of darkness, between Christ and the Man of Sin, between titanic spiritual realities in the visible and invisible worlds with humanity as the battleground? The wicked and unscrupulous men of blood who keep millions upon millions of human beings in chains, wrath, and agony may be but the puppets and emissaries of what both our Lord and His Apostles spoke of as the prince of this world and by other titles, a tremendous mighty and spiritual power contending against God. Is the present hour a specially critical one in human history whose outcome will either be a new manifestation of Christ or a fresh start for civilization upon new and better lines or a period of woe and destruction such as has never been known since the fall of the Roman empire and attended by an influx of such miseries as imagination staggers to contemplate?”
I have a misgiving that my dear old friend is right and that civilization is at a new parting of the ways: victory in the balance - a set-back for all that the name of Christ stands for, or such a revival of vital religion as mankind has never known. There will be a final glorious advent, a complete ending of the present dispensation. Of course there will be; the Church has never surrendered that expectation nor can she do so and remain faithful to her divine commission.
- R. J. CAMPBELL, D.D.